Critical Theory Notes: 03/05/09
The Family
Status symbol of success
Couple on couch, children in background
“warm inviting” smiles
France is becoming the same as Western Culture
Similar advertisements
Status symbols: car, clothes, income, home
Conformity is spreading across boundaries and cultures
The Family Unit
Square/ Grid geometry juxtaposed against leisure and happiness
Redundancy, boring = absurd
Victimization to commodity
Commodity
Falsity
life is being falsified by commodity
A disconnection occurs through commodity
Connection through disconnection
Need
How do you define a need?
Society defines our needs, it shapes our desires and needs
Needs are advertised for our core being –our identity- and target other people’s desires to only sell
Mentality of wants controlled by media is passed on
People become consumed in the details and become overwhelmed. The spectacle grows.
Contradiction of the past and the present, from wanting to explore the seas, and extend our boundaries to being content with staying stagnate, and staying away from what is considered foreign
Foreignness creates division
Real needs/necessities
Food, shelter, community/social connection
The Spectacle
Social needs create the spectacle
Debord’s thesis #4: The spectacle is not a collection of images, but a social relation among people, mediated by images.
Cognitive about the spectacle
It is up to the individual to be/become aware of the disconnection created through the spectacle
The spectacle has influenced our lives, whether we are aware of it –or not
Examples
Facebook:
Representation of reality through images
Knowledge of the disconnect/ consciousness of a disconnection
Ritual
Contains disconnection, may be following former patterns of social networks, i.e. advertisement, cinema, art
Art/Cinema:
Reflexive: Debord’s films are about the destructive/ controlling nature about film in itself
Equally as fake as reality
It’s considered entertainment to watch fake reality
Cycle of redundancy
Mimetic Behavior
Plato’s Theory:
Ideas
Knowledge
Perception
Imitations of ideas
Art
Imitations of imitations
draws upon emotions, which are not wholly rational
encourages mimus/ immitation
people learn through imitating behaviors and emotions (bases of knowledge)
people copy what is seen on stage/tv
copying has a rational and irrational side (intellectual and emotional)
Mimetic Cognition
None of us know why we are copying certain behaviors
Positive/Neutral/ Negative behavior
A form of enslavement
Debord is commenting that this is how we are being controlled
Whoever/Whatever shapes our lives, or conditions, controls us
Identification
We cannot stop identification, so we have to learn how to control the identification process
Avante-Guarde cinema breaks the audience from ‘straight cinema’ (Hollywood narrative film-making)
Debord’s films are an example of Avante-Guarde cinema.
Makes the audience uncomfortable because the audience has nothing to identify with, no hero to root for/want to resemble
When the audience is comfortable, the audience stops thinking. The audience begins to think when they are uncomfortable. The audience becomes aware/conscious
Guy Debord is trying to ask the audience to reflect on where his/her behavior is coming from. His films are a collage to show what we are being conditioned by. Art is just a representation of representations of ideas; cinema is also a form of art. Debord is being reflexive by saying through art that art is conditioning society and the individual. Mimetic behavior is how people learn. Negatively, perceptions are being altered and conditioning individuals, feeding into the cycle of the spectacle. Debord is consciousness of the good and bad of mimetic behavior; however, he is fed up of the representation of society. Through his reflexive films, he is questioning the audience. He poses no solution, but rather techniques and strategies in order to wake up from the illusion.
The next step to take in order to break the cycle is to be aware, cognition being the tactic. Society has become poisoned and the cure is more of the same poison. Plagiarism is a tactic/strategy. By changing the context, you are creating a new meaning. There is no copyright in critical theory. The notion of property is being destroyed. Marcuse says that the Bourgeois society was subject to property. Debord is saying that they (Bourgeois Society) are happy with their wealth, property and showing it off. This is not a moral happiness. The no copyright ideal is also a concept of no property rights and because of this critical theory can then form a new notion of art and idea. The internet is dismantling the previous concept of anything. The spectacle has potential, but this potential is also dissolving. Copyright has the essence of originality, and to property. Debord is staying away from originality.
i downloaded the entire Guy Debord collection if anyone wants it.
ReplyDeleteNothing like some happy readings! Do you have, by any chance, any "Potlatch" issues in that download? It was a publication that a young Guy Debord published as a member of the Letterist International that is supposedly extremely funny. I think that this marked the development of Debord's militaristic stance on his belifs, because each issue just attacked somebody or something new each issue. Also, originally they were distributed only to those on a short mailing list. You were either invited into, or you were deemed worthy to receive the issue. They've since been reprinted, so i don't think that are as rare as they used to be.
ReplyDeletenopers, sorry bud
ReplyDelete